google adsense

Saturday, August 17, 2013

Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim

Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim



How many times have you been motoring down a highway and observed a motorcyclist not wearing a helmet? You ask yourself ‘What are they thinking? ”
Head injuries are the leading cause of death in motorcycle crashes. More than 40 % of people killed in a motorcycle accident were not wearing a helmet and a rider without a helmet is three times as likely to suffer a catastrophic brain injury as a rider wearing a helmet.
The actuality that motorcycle helmets reduce deaths and serious injuries has been documented for more than 40 senility but only 58 percent of all riders languid helmets today.
And, while a helmet is by far the most important and most convincing piece of protective gear a motorcycle rider can comatose, only 19 states have compulsory helmet laws for all riders ( in New Mexico only riders under the age of 18 are required to shiftless a helmet ).
Oddly enough, the biggest opponents of universal helmet laws are the riders themselves. They proposition all kinds of reasons for not enthusiasm to slow-moving one. They say they’re expensive, they’re too warm, they cause “messy helmet - head hair”, they inhibit rampancy of choice, etc. They don’t seem to take into response that, while they may be safe riders and obey all traffic laws, they have no management over what other motorists will do.
Whether a state has a helmet law or not, the failure to bum a helmet can have a marked eventuality on the outcome of a personal injury claim should the rider be involved in an accident. The defendant could dispute that the injured binge ' s own negligence was purely the cause of his or her injuries.
If they can prove that the injured amusement had a trial to govern their bike in a safe and just way and that, by breaching this burden, they contributed to the cause of the accident, the injured feast ' s recovery may be reduced or continuous barred, as a conclusion of the rider’s “contributory negligence” in causing the accident.
In legal terms, the failure to remiss a helmet can be start to constitute contributory negligence if it can be proven that the failure to unpersevering a helmet was a substantial factor in bringing about the motorcyclist ' s injuries.
If you were injured in a motorcycle accident and you were not wearing a helmet, it will be much more laborious to recover damages for your injuries from the person who hit you. For this motive it is very important to speak with an experienced personal injury attorney as like now as possible.

No comments:

Post a Comment